Recent Posts

BREAKING NEWS

KEEP IN TOUCH,WHAT IS HAPPENING IN WORLD

POLITICS IS WORRSHIP

WHICH PARTY IS DOING BEST FOR HIS NATION AND WHAT IS HAPPENING

SPORTS

DO YOU LOVE SPORTS,THEN YOU ARE AT RIGHT PLATEFORM

HEALTH

HEALTH IS MORE IMPORTANT THEN ANYTHING ELSE

MOVIES

HOLLYWOOD,BOLLYWOOD MOVIES ,DARAMS ,SERIES, SEASONS.

Wednesday, 30 January 2019

ALL HARRY POTTER MOVIES RANKED WORST TO BEST BY TOMATOMETER

ALL HARRY POTTER MOVIES RANKED WORST TO BEST BY TOMATOMETER



The Harry Potter film franchise ruled the box office for a decade, but it also managed the uncommon feat of earning Certified Fresh status for every single one of its installments. It remains one of the most successful movie sagas of all time, and it’s even spawned a spinoff series — currently in progress — with the Fantastic Beasts franchise. With all of that in mind, we decided to take a look back at every Harry Potter movie ranked, Total Recall style!

8. HARRY POTTER AND THE ORDER OF THE PHOENIX (2007)  77%


As the curtain rises on the fifth Potter film, the wizarding world is in a tizzy over Lord Voldemort’s return, split between two factions: those who believe Harry’s contention that He Who Must Not Be Named is back for vengeance, and those who think the whole thing is nonsense. Unfortunately, Hogwarts’ newest professor, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), falls squarely into the latter camp — and when Harry, Ron, and Hermione take it upon themselves to lead a group of students through secret self-defense courses, she makes it her mission to keep them in line by any means necessary. New director David Yates and incoming screenwriter Michael Goldenberg had their work cut out for them when it came to whittling down the 870-page book, and ultimately, plenty of fans and critics felt Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix suffered in its screen translation — at 78 percent on the Tomatometer, it’s the worst-reviewed in the series. But even if it wasn’t quite on par with its predecessors, Phoenix was enough for critics like Desson Thomson of the Washington Post, who said Yates and Goldenberg “have transformed J.K. Rowling’s garrulous storytelling into something leaner, moodier and more compelling, that ticks with metronomic purpose as the story flits between psychological darkness and cartoonish slapstick.”

7. HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS - PART 1 (2010)  78%

Jaap Buitendijk/Warner Bros. courtesy Everett Collection

After struggling for years to trim J.K. Rowling’s increasingly unwieldy books down to feature length, Warner Bros. decided to split the final installment, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, into two films — a controversial move that was applauded by those who felt it would give the filmmakers an opportunity to spend more time fleshing out the story, and derided by others, who saw it as a money-grubbing move by the studio. Whatever the reasons for the split, it meant that Deathly Hallows, Part 1 would end roughly in the middle of the book, which finds Harry, Ron, and Hermione on the run from Voldemort and his minions while they struggle to find and destroy the Horcruxes — bits of the Dark Lord’s soul, magically preserved in a series of artifacts, granting him immortality as long as they exist. It all adds up to a film that couldn’t help but feel like a setup for the final chapter, which had a definite dampening effect on some critics’ enthusiasm. For others, though, the penultimate Potter stood on its own merits: “Even though it ends in the middle,” argued the New York Times’ A.O. Scott, it “finds notes of anxious suspense and grave emotion to send its characters, and its fans, into the last round.”

6. HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE (2001)  81%


By 2001, J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter books were a worldwide phenomenon, with the first four installments in the series selling millions of copies and helping reignite the market for young adult literature along the way — but that was still no guarantee that filmgoers were going to turn out when the Hogwarts gang showed up on the big screen. Of course, we all know what happened next: Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone kicked off our ten-year cinematic infatuation with Ron, Hermione, and the Boy Who Lived, grossing nearly $975 million while doing an impressive job of managing the nearly impossible balancing act between staying true to the book and offering a reasonably streamlined film. It entertained audiences while piquing the curiosity of critics like Jonathan Rosenbaum of the Chicago Reader, who wrote, “I hear the J.K. Rowling books are great, and on the basis of this 2001 movie I’m ready to believe it.”

5. HARRY POTTER AND THE CHAMBER OF SECRETS (2002)  82%


After setting up the war between Harry and Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) with Sorcerer’s Stone, the Potterseries set about untangling the mysteries of the Dark Lord’s past with Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, which posed a crucial riddle (Tom Riddle, to be exact) regarding the evil wizard’s true identity while foreshadowing Harry’s eventual romance with Ginny Weasley. Along the way, Chamber served up a deft blend of comedy and drama, plenty of magical thrills, and a terrific supporting cast that included John Cleese and Kenneth Branagh. “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets is superior to its predecessor in every way,” wrote Terry Lawson of the Detroit Free Press, calling it “more thrilling, more entertaining and, yep, more magical.”

4. HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE (2009)  83%


For most of the Harry Potter films, Voldemort lurked in the peripheral darkness, gathering his forces and getting ready to strike — but after the climactic battle that closed The Order of the Phoenix, everyone was aware of his return, and all bets were off. As Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince opens, Voldemort’s campaign of terror has begun in earnest, and his army is everywhere — even within the hallowed halls of Hogwarts, where Harry and Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) are working overtime to thwart a plan involving Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) and Harry’s nemesis, Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton). Calling it “the franchise’s best so far,” David Germain of the Associated Press praised Prince for “blending rich drama and easy camaraderie among the actors with the visual spectacle that until now has been the real star of the series.”

3. HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE (2005)  88%


At a whopping 734 pages, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire nearly doubled the length of Prisoner of Azkaban, leaving screenwriter Steve Kloves the more-difficult-than-usual task of pruning away all but the most essential bits of story for the film. The final result clocked in at more than two and a half hours, but still skipped over or condensed quite a bit of the book. Fortunately, the story that remained — an account of an underage Harry’s surprise entry in the Triwizard Tournament, his struggles to overcome the challenges of the contest, and his first showdown with an ever-more-powerful Voldemort — was more than enough for filmgoers, who shelled out more than $895 million at the box office, as well as critics like Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times, who wrote, “It’s not until Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire that a film has successfully re-created the sense of stirring magical adventure and engaged, edge-of-your-seat excitement that has made the books such an international phenomenon.”

2. HARRY POTTER AND THE PRISONER OF AZKABAN (2004)  90%


In Harry Potter’s world, things are often not as they seem — whether they’re magical train stations, flying cars, talking paintings, or even the legends of long-lost family friends who have been locked away in wizard prison for murdering one’s parents. It’s a lesson Harry learned in Prisoner of Azkaban, which introduced filmgoers to the menacing Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), a shapeshifting convict whose escape is of grave importance to Harry and his friends — but not for the reasons they might think. The recipient of the Potter films’ best reviews (until Deathly Hallows, Part 2 came out, anyway), Azkaban found things getting mighty dark for our young wizards — and gave Alfonso Cuarón a turn in the director’s chair, taking over after Chris Columbus handled the first two installments. As far as Salon’s Stephanie Zacharek was concerned, it was “The first true Harry Potter movie — the first to capture not only the books’ sense of longing, but their understanding of the way magic underlies the mundane, instead of just prancing fancifully at a far remove from it.”

1. HARRY POTTER AND THE DEATHLY HALLOWS - PART 2 (2011)  96%


After teasing all that pent-up demand for the final showdown between the Boy Who Lived and He Who Must Not Be Named, there was a lot riding on Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2 — and director David Yates delivered with aplomb, using Hallows‘ halved structure to leave himself more than two hours to play with in an action-packed final chapter. Everyone knew it was going to be a hit long before it arrived in theaters, but few would have dared predict just how successful Part 2 would be on a critical level: at 96 percent on the Tomatometer, it outpaced every other entry in the series, sending the franchise out on a triumphant high note. “It has been extraordinarily fun, and now the decade-long saga has reached its grand finale. The best,” wrote Claudia Puig for USA Today, “has been saved for the last.”

Quinton de Kock and seamers seal South Africa's series win

Quinton de Kock and seamers seal South Africa's series win






South Africa 241 for 3 (De Kock 83, du Plessis 50*, van der Dussen 50*) beat Pakistan 240 for 8 (Fakhar 70, Imad 47*, Phehlukwayo 2-42, Pretorius 2-46) by seven wickets
The rain that briefly threatened as dark clouds swirled above the Table Mountain didn't come, but the series decider was still a damp squib in the end. Across a series that had been as unpredictable as it was streaky, Pakistan appeared to have the upper hand as well as the momentum following a crushing win in Johannesburg. South Africa, though, repaid the favour in kind with a thumping at Newlands, set up by a brilliantly disciplined performance from their bowling allrounders, and killed off thanks to a sizzling 58-ball 83 by Quinton de Kock. The 240 Pakistan had posted was, as Andile Phehlukwayoconfidently said at the innings break, "definitely below par", South Africa hunting it down with seven wickets and ten overs to spare.
This has been a frustrating series in its denial of on-field drama. In the third ODI, which promised to be a thriller, rain intervened to play spoilsport, and when the series moved to the Wanderers and now Newlands, the contest the spectators craved was nowhere to be found. Here, at least, the Cape Town crowd will go home with the warm glow of a match clinically won, and a series South Africa had treated as something of a guinea pig well retained.
In any case, do catch yourself before feeling too sorry for the people who came out today. They will carry memories of one of the most exciting sights in world cricket right now, treated as they were to a de Kock special, which pushed the limits of what a man could achieve on natural talent alone. It was close - one heel of a boot, to be precise - to being snuffed in its embryonic stages, when de Kock skied Usman Shinwari with his innings having only just begun, only for last game's hero to have narrowly overstepped.
It was a criminal oversight, and de Kock set about to punishing Shinwari and his side duly. Shinwari himself was tonked for 18 in an over, with de Kock unafraid to take on the short ball from Pakistan's quickest bowler in the 19th over, dispatching both deliveries above his shoulder for sixes. He had earlier dismantled Shadab Khan, upsetting his line with repeated reverse-sweeps, and punishing him with more conventional strokes when he missed his length.
It was through the middle stages that South Africa dragged Pakistan back with clinical efficiency, not only undoing the damage incurred early on but also limiting the visitors back to 240. It was the allrounders rather than the bowling specialists who hit Pakistan hardest: Andile Phehlukwayo, Dwaine Pretoriusand Wiaan Mulder sharing five wickets between them to set up the series win.
Despite the fact that teams batting first had only lost twice at Newlands in the last 18 years after having posted 240, and 23 of the last 29 matches have seen the chasing side vanquished, du Plessis decided to put Pakistan in first. That all four matches this series prior had been won by the team batting second may have played a part, with the South African captain prioritising the most recent history rather than records further down the years. Dale Steyn got them off to the best possible start, Pakistan's leading run-scorer this series Imam-ul-Haq dismissed slashing one down to third man in just the third over.
Fakhar Zaman was more relaxed than he has been recently, perhaps buoyed after an early lifeline, punishing width outside the off stump regularly throughout his innings. The slash through the covers was his most productive shot, but he was almost equally proficient square on the other side, with anything close to the body dismissed to square leg. That Pakistan had South Africa on the backfoot and could aspire to a total around 275 early on was down almost solely to him. When Phehlukwayo dismissed him, Imran Tahir executing a catch at fine leg with his foot millimetres from touching the boundary, he had made 70 off 73, and that was as good as it would get for Pakistan.
That brought things to a near standstill for Pakistan, with Shoaib Malik, Mohammad Rizwan, Mohammad Hafeez and Shadab Khan all incapable of putting the innings back on track. Rizwan, given a rare opportunity to impress, was found wanting on the day. Pakistan's second-choice wicketkeeper never could set his innings on course, with Pretorius ensnaring him as he attempted a wild slog. Having scored just 10 off 30 balls, he was emblematic of his side's toil in the middle overs. Just 52 were scored in the 16 overs that followed Fakhar Zaman's dismissal, and where once Pakistan dreamed of 275, they would now have to scramble for 240.



To their credit, the pace trio of Phehlukwayo, Mulder and Pretorius did an outstanding job of controlling the middle overs. They varied their pace through that period, a major reason why the batsmen never appeared to find the timing to get their innings going. The frustration boiled over into the way they ran between the wickets; when a mix-up between Shadab and Shoaib resulted in the captain being runout, it surprised no one - frenetic running and scrambled minds had lent that wicket an air of inevitability. It was almost a wicket you could add to the tally of the bowler Pretorius, with the run out coming off the last ball of a frustratingly tight over. The series was being sealed in those moments before lunch.

Tuesday, 29 January 2019

News1








US bashed Iran for launching satellite and ultimately launch failed





US warned Iran on satellite launching, while Iran launched it on this Tuesday and the satellite failed to reach the orbit.
Mohammad Jahromi, Iran’s Minister of Communications and Information Technology stated: “The satellite did not reach enough speed in the third stage and was not put into orbit,” in a lunching ceremony at Imam Khomeini Spaceport earlier on Tuesday.
However, the minister was still very optimistic and announced that it will launch another satellite soon.
Mike Pompeo, US Secretary of State, threatened Iran to give up the idea of launching any satellite or the country will face more sanctions.







Iran satellite launch


According to Pompeo statement, satellite launching by Iran are against UN Security Council resolution passed in 2015. Later on, January 3rd, he passed another statement arguing that “such space launches incorporate technology that is virtually identical to that used in ballistic missiles, including in intercontinental ballistic-missiles (ICBMs).”
While, analysts told media that the satellite was only meant for telecommunications.
The speech delivered last week by Pompeo in Cairo last week, hyped about the withdrawal of withdrawal landmark Iran nuclear deal done in the era of former US President Barack Obama’s and spoke to the media for US “campaign to stop Iran’s malevolent influence and actions against this region and the world.”
US President, Donald Trump, has crippled the Iran economy by aggressive sanctions done twice this year, ultimately increasing the inflation rates, causing food shortages and forcing the big foreign companies to move out of the country.
Another incident occur were Norwegian plane remain stuck in Iran due to some technical error that led to immediate landing of plane on Shiraz airport enroute from Dubai to Olso.
The increased sanctions and export restrictions on Iran led to the delayed mending of the aircraft that was supposed to take off again.

Friday, 25 January 2019

Sports

Imam-ul-Haq has been more or less a permanent fixture in the side for over a year, but talk of his close relationship with chief selector Inzamam-ul-Haqshows no sign of abating. On this occasion, it was Imam himself who chose to bring it to the spotlight following a fiery reaction, after the opener reached his fifth ODI hundred.
When Imam got to the landmark with a cut through point off Tabraiz Shamsi in the third ODI at Supersport Park, he removed his helmet, locked eyes with the changing room and made a yapping gesture with his hands before putting his finger to his lips, as if to silence someone. Two balls later, he holed out at deep extra-cover for 101, but by the end of the innings, it was obvious his burning sense of injustice continued to rage.
When asked by commentator Mike Haysman about the message he had wished to convey, Imam said, "[That gesture was about] my selection and all that stuff. I am the nephew of the chief selector. To all the people who criticised me over the years, the media and the people, I want to thank them. This has been possible because of them."
Imam has previously spoken of his irritation at the suggestion he owes his place in the side to nepotism. Speaking to ESPNcricinfo last year, he said that suggestion had "really pissed me off", insisting he had earned his place in the side as much as any other player. Murmurs about his famous uncle and the role he played in getting Imam to the Pakistan side have never quite gone away, though Inzamam has repeatedly claimed he did not push for his nephew's inclusion.
Having been called up to make his international debut in an ODI against Sri Lanka amid immense scrutiny for the same reasons, Imam became the second Pakistan player to score a hundred on ODI debut. He followed it up with another three in the five-match ODI series against Zimbabwe last year. Friday's century means he now has five centuries and four half-centuries in 19 ODIs. Imam reached another landmark in Centurion, becoming the second fastest to 1000 ODI runs - behind only his opening partner Fakhar Zaman.
Imam has put a challenging Test series behind him in the first three ODIs, following up his 86 in Port Elizabeth with a hundred. Against the red ball in South Africa, he had found batting a struggle, managing 149 runs in six innings at 24.83. He also made a point of thanking the coaches for helping him stay strong, and without whom he said it would be "difficult to stand here".
"The support staff has backed me throughout to go out and just perform. I want to thank [batting coach] Grant Flower and coach Mickey Arthur for supporting me, too. It was a very special hundred. Coming to South Africa, we believed we could win."